Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Integrated change control management

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 18:49, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Integrated change control management

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

See Wikipedia is not a how-to manual. Reads like part of a textbook or course on project management, not a neutral assessment of the views of reliable sources. Robert McClenon (talk) 15:09, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: The topic could be notable, a quick google search beings plenty of results and google books hits on the subject. However, the article is plainly not written as an encycolpedia article. This would place it under WP:DEL14, but I am hesitant to !vote delete as the topic could be notable - I have reservations around WP:TNT. To rewrite it would be the better option here. TheMagikCow (T) (C) 15:37, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Management-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:03, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:59, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- I am an expert in this field. This article adds nothing to Change control. If anyone believes there are any good sentences or references in this article, copy them now to Change control (which also needs some help). Change this article to a Redirect and put it behind us. Rhadow (talk) 11:55, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. In theory, there might be a valid article about this topic but this isn't it, for the WP:NOTHOWTO reasons cited above. It's also hard to see how this differs significantly from Change control, but even a redirect to there seems pointless because I don't see anybody ever typing this into a search box. On the other hand, redirects are WP:CHEAP, so I don't have any real objection to redirecting if somebody feels it would be useful. -- RoySmith (talk) 01:05, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.